Shark’s vacuum cleaners are among the most popular in the country. Their thoughtful designs, solid build quality and innovative features mean that Shark’s products are some of the few appliances out there to go toe-to-toe with the best Dyson vacuums. From flexible wands that enable you to clean under furniture without bending down, to hi-tech sensors that adjust suction based on dirt levels and floor type, Shark vacuums often go the extra mile – and often for hundreds of pounds less than Dyson, Miele, or Samsung.
One of the brand’s greatest strengths is that it offers a wide range of models available, with corded and cordless vacuums, robot vacuums, and even tiny handhelds for cleaning cars and bookshelves.
But with so much on offer – listed under similar names – it can be tricky to know which one will suit your needs. If your heart is set on a Shark, it’s worth weighing up the different options.
That’s why I’ve put a range of Shark vacuums to the test, bringing honest opinions to help you choose the best option for you and your home. Whether you’re tackling pet hair, deep-cleaning carpets, or managing everyday messes, keep scrolling to find out which models impressed me the most.
The best Shark vacuums for 2025 are:
- Best overall – Shark cordless clean and empty, BU3521UK: £350, Argos.co.uk
- Best budget buy – Shark anti-hair-wrap corded vacuum cleaner with flexology, HZ500UK: £179, Amazon.co.uk
- Best for tackling pet hair – Shark powerpro pet cordless stick vacuum, IZ380UKT: £189, Amazon.co.uk
- Best cordless option – Shark stratos anti-hair-wrap plus pet cordless vacuum cleaner, double-battery, IZ420UKT: £479.99, Currys.co.uk
- Best corded design – Shark anti-hair-wrap plus pet upright bagless vacuum cleaner, NZ780UKT: £170, Amazon.co.uk
How I tested
Over the course of six weeks, I put each Shark vacuum cleaner through a series of demanding tests in my busy household, complete with four kids aged three to nine. With a constant stream of crumbs, spills, dirt, and sand from the garden, I evaluated how well each model handled a variety of messes. You can read a detailed view of my testing criteria at the end of this guide.
